Claude-like go-getter models?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>There are so many options now — GPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.</p> <p>I find myself switching depending on what I’m doing (coding, writing, research),

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I recently started using Claude after hearing people gush over how Chat and Gemini are way behind. Maybe so for coding and technical assistance,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>OpenAI's Plus at $20 is genuinely usable. Not perfect, but you get real work done. That's fine.</p> <p>Anthropic is a different story. Claude's

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>No matter what I say, if I try to vent about something or discuss or phrase a simple opinion it always, always, focuses on saying counter points.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We’re releasing GPT‑5.5, our smartest and most intuitive to use model yet, and the next step toward a new way of getting work done on a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers instructions to make TATP (triacetone triperoxide)—a primary explosive used in terrorist attacks—WITHOUT BEING ASKED. It

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am trying to understand the current consensus and legal landscape regarding how public data and developer contributions are being utilized by

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>AI tools are still locked in its own platforms. Is there some standardized way how to set your own workspace once and if you switch between