When are we getting genuinely good video analysis models?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I watch a lot of these science mini documentaries on yt. And up until recently I actually just assumed someone made a lot of effort in the video

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Was wondering if we can put in videos to a model and it’ll help in creating better animations etc cause now Claude code/ cursor takes

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Which AI software is the best a converting Images of ppl Into videos without changing their face too much? </p> <p>Currently I use VIDU, but I

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>And my definition of perfect:</p> <p>The video generated by this model will never produce anything that cannot physically happen (no CGI, I

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello, i would like to question a question.<br /> While seeing the huge advancements we are doing with generative video, im more and more curious

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>AI images used to have tells. Broken text, messed up hands, faces that couldn’t survive a single edit.</p> <p>That’s basicaly gone now. So what

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I keep seeing “audio-to-video converter” used for totally different things, so I’ve been trying to separate the workflows a bit.</p> <p>To me,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>For a normal video prompt, a small visual defect can ruin the result. In an interactive video, I think the priority changes. If I press left and