Forcing LLMs into agent roles via bloated system prompts is a dead end, MiniMax

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The idea is simple, if one agent is good then multiple agents working together must be better. In practice coordination between agents is an

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>want to put a different multi-agent direction on the table because most of what i see assumes task teams.</p> <p>the dominant pattern right now:

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>One recurring issue with domain-specific agents is that overly defensive refusal behavior can make them much less useful once the workflow gets

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s1ckkm/why_llms_sound_right_but_fail_to_actually_do/"> <img alt="Why LLMs sound right but fail to actually

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s439q8/why_does_my_agent_keep_asking_the_same_question/"> <img alt="Why does my agent keep asking the same

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been messing around with local models to see when they fail silently or confidently make stuff up. One test I came up with is a bit wicked

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Every time one of our agents made a bad call in production, we had the same problem. Logs showed what happened. Nothing showed why it decided to

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been working on MDA (Modular Dynamic Architecture), an online associative memory system for LLMs. Here's what I learned building it.</p>