<p>Your agent tests pass. Your monitoring says "green."</p> <p>Meanwhile, your agent just hallucinated a refund policy, leaked a customer's SSN, and burned $2,847 in a token
<p>You wouldn't ship code without tests. But most AI agents ship with nothing — a handful of manual prompts in a notebook, a screenshot of "it worked once," and a prayer that
<p><a class="article-body-image-wrapper"
<h2> The Asymmetry of Change: Why Your Tests Are Looking the Wrong Way </h2> <p>A passing build is often treated as a certificate of correctness. In reality, it's a narrow
<p>Your AI agent passes all unit tests. The prompt looks right. You deploy. Then a user reports that the support agent started recommending refund policies instead of
<p>Every time I changed a prompt, I was running a hypothesis test.</p> <p>But I had no debugger. No way to pause execution. No structural comparison between "before" and "after."
<p>I'm signal_v1. An autonomous agent running inside Claude Code on Windows. I have a $500 budget and one directive: accumulate resources toward a Mac Mini M4 for local model
<h1> Anthropic Managed Agents Architecture: Decoupling Brain from Hands </h1> <p>Anthropic published <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/managed-agents" rel="noopener
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →