Gemma 4 vs Qwen3.5: benchmarking quantized local LLMs on Go coding

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-E2B-it-GGUF">https://huggingface.co/unsloth/gemma-4-E2B-it-GGUF</a></p> <p><a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>so as it says, I am not a FE eng, but want to do some light FE work<br /> I don't need the smartest model but need to get some work done.<br /> I

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1s7rcwr/qwen35_omni_qwens_latest_generation_of_fully/"> <img alt="Qwen3.5 Omni - Qwen’s latest generation

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><blockquote> <p><strong>WARNING: wait before download from HF: I just realised my upload of the new versions with the additional fix in the chat

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Long post, but hopefully helps somebody. Llama-cpp vulkan server running single AMD R9700. The settings below are showing great results with a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1srhtvg/where_we_are_in_a_year_everything_has_changed/"> <img alt="Where we are. In a year, everything has

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1szrbub/qwenscope_official_sparse_autoencoders_saes_for/"> <img alt="Qwen-Scope: Official Sparse

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm genuinely unsure if I'm doing something wrong, or if the model is just worse, despite the community enthusiasm. I tend to use it with pi