<p>Everyone evaluating AI avatar platforms focuses on voice quality. The bigger UX killer is almost always latency — and it's a harder problem than picking a good TTS
<p>Most developers underestimate how hard voice AI actually is.</p> <p>To build a production-ready calling agent, you need to integrate:</p> <p>– SIP signalling</p> <p>– Real-time
<p><em>By <a href="https://parvejshah.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">Parvej Shah</a> — Full-Stack Web Developer & AI Systems Engineer based in Dhaka, Bangladesh.</em></p>
<p>When I was building <a href="https://intervu.dev" rel="noopener noreferrer">intervu.dev</a>, an AI mock coding interviewer that conducts full voice interviews in the browser,
<p>Most AI tutors today feel like glorified chatbots with a text-to-speech layer slapped on top. But what if students could actually <em>talk</em> to their tutor, pause
<p><strong>Something went wrong. The agent said something bizarre, or paused for three seconds, or completely misunderstood the user. The real question is: which layer broke? The
<p>Adding voice messages to an AI companion is one of those features that sounds simple until you try to ship it. "Just use a TTS API and send the audio" -sure, in theory. In
<p>I spent <strong>3-4 weeks</strong> building an AI voice agent that cold-calls HVAC owners for me. Real outbound. Real objection handling. Real appointments booked. When we
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →