Multi-tenant SaaS on a .NET workflow engine, without restarting to onboard a cus

<p>Building a B2B SaaS platform for transport companies, I faced a critical architectural decision: separate database per tenant or shared database with logical isolation?</p>

<p>The multi-tenant SaaS checklist: seven decisions, what each costs if you defer it, and the one everyone worries about far too early.</p> <h2> Overview </h2> <div

<p>One workflow engine for every .NET scenario, as an embeddable library, an HTTP API or a standalone server, now in four products with a new website.</p> <blockquote>

<p>If your SaaS charges customers and also plugs into those customers' billing stack, you do not have one billing problem. You have two.</p> <p>You need to bill your own customer

<p>A multi-tenant Node.js application often starts with something that looks harmless:<br /> </p> <div class="highlight js-code-highlight"> <pre class="highlight

<p>When you're building a multi-tenant SaaS, the first architectural question is usually: how do you keep tenant data isolated? The options range from separate databases per

<p>Thirty commits across three repos, and the day split cleanly into two halves: standing a control plane up on a bare host, and fixing the things that were quietly wrong once it

<p>Ask Codex, Claude or Cursor to wire a workflow library into a .NET service and you usually get code that looks right and calls a method that doesn't exist. Say the agent gets