Is it just me or minimax-m2.7 is a regression in real world usage compared to mi

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Feel like it’s been forever since they announced it; I wonder if it’s going to be better than Qwen 3.5 397b.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32;

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sixhwq/minimax_m27_release_confirmed/"> <img alt="Minimax M2.7 Release Confirmed!"

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1srhtvg/where_we_are_in_a_year_everything_has_changed/"> <img alt="Where we are. In a year, everything has

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Seems likely M3 will need vllm updates and that these may to be need created for sm_120 as this repo only mentions sm_100 support. </p> <p><a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Ok so I've paid for both at their cheapest plans and I have high-level anecdotal feedback on these models.</p> <p><strong>MiniMax

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Which one is the most efficient model in terms of agentic tasks and coding? have you tried any other open sourcemdoel recommend that&gt;</p>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I was trying to load Minimax M3 using the `llama.cpp` main branch and realized that one needs to get an M3 branch. Is there any good reason why