The AI Alignment Problem is just the Principal-Agent Problem -- which we kind of

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I just published an essay called &quot;The Super-Intelligent Octopus Problem&quot; that makes a case I haven't seen articulated elsewhere: the

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1sh3c7g/claude_mythos_preview_is_everyones_problem/"> <img alt="Claude Mythos Preview Is Everyone’s

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>(AI Was not used for generating the below post)</p> <p>I've been developing with AI for over 3 1/2 years now, my AI DM setting operation which

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Every time one of our agents made a bad call in production, we had the same problem. Logs showed what happened. Nothing showed why it decided to

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The idea is simple, if one agent is good then multiple agents working together must be better. In practice coordination between agents is an

<p>Here is the security model baked into most AI agent frameworks:<br /> </p> <div class="highlight js-code-highlight"> <pre class="highlight plaintext"><code>[Agent decides to

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Posting because this sub is where the policy conversation should be happening and it isn't. </p> <p>I'm the COO of a mid-Atlantic insurance

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s439q8/why_does_my_agent_keep_asking_the_same_question/"> <img alt="Why does my agent keep asking the same