Why Bonsai's models are not listed in Artificial Analysis?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've always been under the impression that open models were closely trailing behind closed source models on nearly every benchmark from LM Arena,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The only things released in the last couple weeks seem to be bigger models like Qwen, DeepSeek, GLM, etc. Where are the Laguna's, Nemotrons,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Long time Claude Opus user, but after the recent session limit changes by Anthropic, I am seriously considering trying Chinese models for coding.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As the title said, I'm looking and has anybody done a comparison with other 8B or similar parameter model yet?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32;

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’m trying to understand why models from major labs (GPT, Claude, etc.) dominate real-world usage? You might say it's due to the expensive

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sskmhv/recent_open_models_from_last_6_months_nov_2025/"> <img alt="Recent Open models from last 6 Months -

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>bonsai claim 98.2% intelligent retained, but their own documents show <em>Ternary Bonsai 2 27B reaches 52.8 and 60.8, respectively, compared with