The hard part of building with AI isn't the code — it's catching the BS

<blockquote> <p>Coding is not dying. It already died. You just didn’t attend the funeral.</p> </blockquote> <h2> ⚡ What is Anti-Gravity? </h2> <p>An internal Google IDE that turns

<h2> Introduction: The Moment Manual Coding Became "Optional" </h2> <p>In January 2026, Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code at Anthropic, made a statement that reverberated across

<h2> What Happened </h2> <p>I pay $200/month for Anthropic's highest individual tier — Max 20x. I use Claude Code (their CLI tool) daily with a team of AI agents for building

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50133713">Comments</a>

<p>Are AI tools actually making us dumber developers?</p> <p>It's a question that's been nagging at me lately. As a freelance web developer, I've seen firsthand how quickly AI can

<p>"The Reasoning Trap." The line the authors won't quite say out loud is that the smarter your model gets at reasoning, the more likely it is to fabricate a tool that doesn't

<p>A few months ago I had a question that didn't let me sleep. When people ask ChatGPT "what's the best tool for X", which brands actually get mentioned? And more importantly:

<h2> From "Prove It in Code" to "Prove It in Judgment" </h2> <p>For decades, credibility in software came from what you built with your own hands. Writing robust systems required