Sourcing integrity within Projects

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><strong>Submitted by:</strong> Adam Kruger <strong>Date:</strong> March 23, 2026 <strong>Models Solved:</strong> 3/3 (M1, M2, M3) + Warmup</p>

<p>Here is the security model baked into most AI agent frameworks:<br /> </p> <div class="highlight js-code-highlight"> <pre class="highlight plaintext"><code>[Agent decides to

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1sw0vcf/stanford_researchers_fed_a_language_model_a_dna/"> <img alt="Stanford researchers fed a language model a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I just noticed this today. ChatGPT marginally obey's it, and seems to only do it on the first initiation of a conversation, but after that, it

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1t5lywi/i_analyzed_922_agentic_task_trace_and_found_the/"> <img alt="I analyzed 922 agentic task trace and

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Projects are <a href="https://github.com/snap-research/locomo/issues/31">still submitting new scores on LoCoMo as of March 2026.</a> but the

<p><em>The AWS Reliability Files, Part 1</em></p> <p>I told an AI a true fact about AWS. Then I had a second AI confidently insist it was wrong. Within one exchange, the first

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Every time one of our agents made a bad call in production, we had the same problem. Logs showed what happened. Nothing showed why it decided to