<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Recently I’ve been thinking about shifting from conferences to journals due to a few bad experiences with ML conferences reviewing process. The
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone. This is just a small rant on my part. I’m relatively young, a final year undergrad, and I’ve been interested in AI researcher
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been thinking about the current state of machine learning PhDs, including my own work, and I’d like to hear how others see it.<br /> My
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I saw someone's paper get accepted to ICML and they literally just did prompt engineering. Ignoring whatever misgivings about how pointless that
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This wasn't always the case, but now almost any research topic in machine learning that you can imagine is now being done MUCH BETTER in industry
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>What is your opinion on long appendices in conference papers?</p> <p>I am observing that appendix lengths in conference papers (ICML, NeurIPS,
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →