LLM Inference Optimization and Benchmarking

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I tested two llama.cpp builds on the same <strong>Qwen3.6-27B-NVFP4</strong> model.</p> <p><code>llama-bench</code> reports the model label as

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><em>A deep dive into implementing TurboQuant, validating its claims, and understanding where theory meets real-world systems</em></p> <h1>1.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey everyone, I've been working on getting Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) working with quantized GGUFs for Qwen3-27B and the results are pretty

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Got Qwen 3.5 27B to 1,103,941 tok/s on 12 nodes with 96 B200 GPUs.</p> <p>At that rate you process 50,000 insurance policy documents in hours

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I applied video compression to LLM inference and got <strong>10,000x less quantization error at the same storage cost</strong></p> <p><a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Every output token the model generates requires reading the entire KV cache from High Bandwidth Memory.</p> <p>Here's what that actually looks

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1t4uj9h/mtp_on_strix_halo_with_llamacpp_pr_22673/"> <img alt="MTP on strix halo with llama.cpp (PR #22673)"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Wrote a deep dive on <strong>FlashAttention-4 (03/05/2026)</strong> that's relevant for anyone thinking about inference performance.</p>