anyone actually tried deepseek v4 pro for coding?

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1su3fle/deepseek_v4_flash_pro_now_out_on_api/"> <img alt="DeepSeek V4 Flash &amp; Pro Now out on API"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello Guys,<br /> Each time a new local llm is released, there are a ton of new posts , this is it, it's near Opus level...., the abliteration

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1su3wf7/deepseek_v4_released/"> <img alt="Deepseek V4 Released"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am amazed by the development of locallm in the coding area. Right now im Testing Qwen3.6 27b and it works quite well, even tho this is not made

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><a href="https://huggingface.co/collections/deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4">https://huggingface.co/collections/deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4</a></p>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey 👋</p> <p>Saw the tweet making the rounds about deepseek v4 being 35x cheaper than opus on input and 178x cheaper on cached tokens, and was

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Please</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Comrade_United-World"> /u/Comrade_United-World </a>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>How are you finding these models, which one do you find to be better for real use cases?</p> <p>So far we're finding Kimi k2.6 better for coding,