AI Writes Code. You Own Quality.

<h2> The Asymmetry of Change: Why Your Tests Are Looking the Wrong Way </h2> <p>A passing build is often treated as a certificate of correctness. In reality, it's a narrow

<p>CI is red. You open the PR. Now what?</p> <p>You click the failing workflow. You read the logs. You open the trace viewer in a separate tab. You cross-reference the error with

<p>An AI coding agent implements a feature, generates tests, runs them, and opens a pull request with a green build.</p> <p>That looks like independent verification. It often is

<p>My build passed on my laptop. It died on a free server in 40 seconds.</p> <p>Same code. Same lockfile. Same commit hash. So what changed?</p> <p>The answer is boring and

<p>Your agent passed all the tests. It's been running in production for three weeks. And it has been quietly wrong the entire time.</p> <p>This is not a hypothetical. Galileo's

<p>I read the phrase "spec-driven development" and immediately decided it was for people without taste. Six months later, Claude Code generated a discount system that applied

<p>Last month I asked a senior candidate the same question I ask everyone. "Tell me about a flaky test you fixed and how you fixed it."</p> <p>She paused and said, "I just added a

<h1> Why Separating QA Code from Dev Code in Your Monorepo is a Game-Changer for E2E Testing. </h1> <h2> The Pain Is Real </h2> <p>Friday, 2 PM. Your team just ran 500 E2E tests.