<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1u2xbpz/will_it_be_better_than_fable_5/"> <img alt="Will it be better than Fable 5?"
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Not a leak, not a codename, not a screenshot of someone else’s screenshot. It’s sitting in the app above Opus 5, described as “for your hardest
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It was allegedly supposed to be rereleased today, but I cannot access it in any official interface at work or on personal accounts. Does anyone
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If this is supposed to be the magical mythos, but with safeguard’s, I’m not impressed. I’m not sure if they’re shuttling queries to other models
  submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/OkAssociation3448"> /u/OkAssociation3448 </a> <br /> <span><a
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1w4jri0/fable_51_is_out/"> <img alt="Fable 5.1 is out"
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A model that works only with extra credits and is not embedded into even the largest of packages should not even be released to the public IMO.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Opus 4.6 / Fable was my happy place.<br /> Opus 4.8 is driving me nuts...overly verbose, doing work we never asked for, using really really bad
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →