Frustrated that Claude is an Incorrect Agreement Machine

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It literally responded with &quot;You're absolutely right I cant&quot;</p> <p>I have no clue what I am going to do now.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If it were trained to be helpful, it would stop confidently giving blatantly false answers while trying to fill the gaps.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers instructions to make TATP (triacetone triperoxide)—a primary explosive used in terrorist attacks—WITHOUT BEING ASKED. It

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>OpenAI's Plus at $20 is genuinely usable. Not perfect, but you get real work done. That's fine.</p> <p>Anthropic is a different story. Claude's

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So, I got a bit burned out on all the long bullet lists and the 'and honestly?' ceremony by ChatGPT, and switched to Claude for a bit.</p> <p>At

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Anthropic is dropping Claude Code for Pro (MAX is next). Can we come use Codex? </p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>No matter what I say, if I try to vent about something or discuss or phrase a simple opinion it always, always, focuses on saying counter points.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know AI is genuinely an impressive technology. But sometimes I’ll have moments like these that I’m reminded it is not a reliable arbiter of the