So if GPT-5.6 is on part with Fable 5, won’t the government take it down to?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I whipped this up the other day and it has lived in a window on my monitor since then. It is nonsense-free (no gags, no jokes, no chatrooms, no

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1w4lsf3/fable_51_on_artificial_analysis/"> <img alt="Fable 5.1 on Artificial Analysis"

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/GusBus135"> /u/GusBus135 </a> <br /> <span><a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1u2xbpz/will_it_be_better_than_fable_5/"> <img alt="Will it be better than Fable 5?"

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1ukvm80/fable_5_is_back/"> <img alt="Fable 5 is Back!"

“We don’t believe this kind of government access process should become the long-term default,” says OpenAI. “It keeps the best tools from users, developers, enterprises, cyber

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/PuzzleheadedScore330"> /u/PuzzleheadedScore330 </a> <br /> <span><a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1ukbtjm/fable_5_will_divert_coding_to_opus_48_according/"> <img alt="Fable 5 will divert coding to Opus 4.8