More Criticism Does Not Make a Better Review: EquiReview-R

arXiv:2607.15388v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many math- and science-oriented agent systems use hierarchical designs with specialized reviewer roles, assuming that a dedicated

arXiv:2604.09590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated peer review is often framed as generating fluent critique, yet reviewers and area chairs need judgments they can

arXiv:2606.19749v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A new class of agentic review systems are emerging as a remedy to the pressure placed on peer review systems by AI-assisted

arXiv:2604.13940v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific peer review faces mounting strain as submission volumes surge, making it increasingly difficult to sustain review

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<p>A state-of-the-art review of the first body of evidence on AI-assisted development was posted to arXiv on 20 Aug 2026. It is a preprint, not itself peer reviewed, though the

arXiv:2603.27360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rebuttal generation is a critical component of the peer review process for scientific papers, enabling authors to clarify

arXiv:2605.06772v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) show increasing promise on research-level physics reasoning tasks and agentic AI becomes more