The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspection

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272984">Comments</a>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><pre><code>Built a system where Claude Code writes the code and Codex CLI reviews it independently — the reviewer never sees the builder's

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47704285">Comments</a>

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50133713">Comments</a>

<p>The agent generates 40 lines of code. You read the diff. You approve the change.</p> <p>What just happened there? You didn't write code. You didn't design a flow. You didn't

AI generates more code than devs can track in 2026, so will the code review process have to adapt &#8211; or is it doomed? A look into this decades-old practice and the approaches

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541496">Comments</a>

<p><em>8 dimensions. 38 checks. 5 seconds. 0% industry pass rate.</em></p> <h2> The Problem </h2> <p>DAST exists for web apps. DAST exists for APIs. DAST does not exist for AI