Missed AAAI reciprocal reviewer nomination deadline — risk of desk rejection? [D

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>UAI review results were released last Thursday, and the discussion period was clearly stated as April 23 to May 2nd.

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1udsfgk/will_i_be_desk_rejected_for_thisr/"> <img alt="Will I be desk rejected for this[R]"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper cited and even built up on a niche topic that was accepted in 2024. The template and everything was also followed properly. Sure, it

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My ACL ARR submission was desk rejected because I had two versions of the same paper in the same cycle. This happened because I mistakenly

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone 👋</p> <p>I wanted to publish my very first scientific article on platforms like arXiV or ResearchGate, but because I do not have

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, this ICML workshop: <a href="https://trustworthy-ai-for-good.github.io/">https://trustworthy-ai-for-good.github.io/</a> says abstract

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper got accepted at an ACM conference and I'm doing the camera-ready through TAPS. The PDF compiled fine, but TAPS flagged a &quot;source to