<p>A while back I inherited a service whose Docker image was 1.2GB. Pulls were slow, the CI cache was useless, and the deploy step took long enough that people context-switched
<h2> The Problem with Fat Images </h2> <p>We've all been there: you pull a Docker image, and it's 1.2GB. You run a simple Node app, and the image is bigger than your entire OS.
<p>When I started working with Docker, I made the same <br /> mistake most beginners make — I used the full base image <br /> and copied everything into the container without
<p>A 1.2 GB image for a service that's a few megabytes of compiled code is one of those things everyone accepts until someone actually looks at it. Slow pulls, slow deploys, a
<p>In Q3 2025, our 14-person frontend team stared down a 3.2MB initial bundle for our Angular 18 enterprise resource planning (ERP) app — a figure that triggered 4.7s first
<h2> A 14-Second Build Dropped to 3 Seconds, Then Everything Else Went Wrong </h2> <p>Six months ago, our API was a standard Express + TypeScript setup running on Node.js 22. It
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →