Verdict in for the bellwether case in the thousands of claims against social media companies for making harmful products. Jury ruled in favor of the now 20-year-old plaintiff, who
Meta challenges New Mexico's $3.7 billion plan for teen mental health in social media trial reut.rs/4d9zrUV
Is social media not just bad, but illegally bad? Should tech companies pay for making it that way? According to two US juries - and no shortage of outside commentary - the answer
<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520717">Comments</a>
Google and Meta denied new trial in youth social media addiction case reut.rs/4vADrUH
Two juries are currently deliberating a series of cases that could either usher in a legal reckoning for Meta, or maintain the status quo in an uphill battle to impose changes or
Meta asks California judge to throw out landmark social media addiction verdict reut.rs/42Y7nhb
Social media companies have long seemed impervious to legal threats. Meta, YouTube, Snap, and the rest have long waved off criticism of their platforms on free speech and Section
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →