Tech bros discovered coding isn't the hard part

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just went through a Stanford paper that tracked 51 actual AI deployments - not surveys or sentiment polls, real production systems across 41

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'll be upfront about my endgame: I work at a large tech company, I have a niche picked out, and I'm making the move to build and sell AI agents

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It’s been somewhere between 1 and 1.5 years since I last wrote a line of code.</p> <p>I wrote everything from Assembly and C to Python and

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Cursor dropped their new product yesterday and its not a code editor anymore. its an agent orchestration console that happens to have an editor

<blockquote> <p>Coding is not dying. It already died. You just didn’t attend the funeral.</p> </blockquote> <h2> ⚡ What is Anti-Gravity? </h2> <p>An internal Google IDE that turns

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The productivity metrics on AI coding tools focus almost entirely on acceptance rate and time saved. The metric nobody is tracking is technical

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I came across a large survey of 2,400 executives and employees on where AI adoption actually stands right now, and the divide it's creating is

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Per Bloomberg:</p> <p>Global AI sales, excluding China, reached $25 billion for hyperscalers and neoclouds in the first quarter of 2026,