Could UBI lead us to a better future?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I don’t know if this is the right sub. I work for a software consultancy. We have projects for a number of clients that are meant to automate

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I came across a large survey of 2,400 executives and employees on where AI adoption actually stands right now, and the divide it's creating is

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Ok best case scenarios, what happens to the economy? AI takes everyone’s jobs and companies are so efficient. Okay, now what? Who buys the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Based on the research paper here: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20617">https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20617</a></p> <p>I made a small

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>People often mention UBI as the solution if AI displaces a large part of the workforce. But I don’t fully understand how it would work with the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><ul> <li>Agents that change behavior under evaluation</li> <li>Agents that bypass system-level instructions to achieve objectives</li> <li>Agents

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just say AI , or any other emerging phenomenon, fails after 5/10/15 years. </p> <p>Would that equal an enormous net loss of wealth ? </p>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>OpenAI CEO Sam Altman joined Alex Heath on the <em>Sources</em> podcast (Sept 2026) for a 1h 09m conversation unpacking why OpenAI paused a