I stopped thinking about “pause/resume” for agent workflows once tool calls had

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve been in QA for almost a decade. My mental model for quality was always: given input X, assert output Y. Now I’m on a team that’s shipping an

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s439q8/why_does_my_agent_keep_asking_the_same_question/"> <img alt="Why does my agent keep asking the same

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1s1ckkm/why_llms_sound_right_but_fail_to_actually_do/"> <img alt="Why LLMs sound right but fail to actually

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Read a piece this week where the author admitted she built what she was confidently calling an agent — RAG-based, tool-aware, natural language

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The idea is simple, if one agent is good then multiple agents working together must be better. In practice coordination between agents is an

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1wpl8aw/where_an_agent_loop_runs_how_it_fails_and_how_to/"> <img alt="Where an agent loop runs, how it

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>One recurring issue with domain-specific agents is that overly defensive refusal behavior can make them much less useful once the workflow gets

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If you run persistent LLM agents that coordinate across tmux sessions, this one's worth knowing.</p> <p>I dispatch tasks between agent sessions