Kimi 2.6 and qwen3.6 is out but still as slow as ever

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am amazed by the development of locallm in the coding area. Right now im Testing Qwen3.6 27b and it works quite well, even tho this is not made

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1srhtvg/where_we_are_in_a_year_everything_has_changed/"> <img alt="Where we are. In a year, everything has

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1t4kkvb/tested_four_newest_open_source_kimi_k26_is_the/"> <img alt="tested four newest open source Kimi K2.6

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have been following the akitaonrails coding benchmark which tests against a fixed rails + Rubyllm + docker task rather than vendor-reported

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Kimi K2.6 has been getting a lot of hype recently, mostly because it seems like a “good enough for coding, way cheaper than frontier models”

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>With practically all of LocalLlama glazing Qwen 3.5/3.6 for it's coding skills. Along with the fact that Alibaba themselves are focusing on

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm genuinely unsure if I'm doing something wrong, or if the model is just worse, despite the community enthusiasm. I tend to use it with pi

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Has anyone tested both models against each other till now? Which one should I use?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a