I suddenly realized I have started mimicking writing style of LLMs.

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1s2jsl0/i_think_i_stopped_talking_now_i_just_prompt/"> <img alt="I think I stopped talking… now I just prompt"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Question: Has anyone else started using poor grammar and typos just to prove they aren’t AI? Or am I just a weirdo. </p> <p>I consider myself a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>You know the feeling when you open an article and within two sentences you already know it was Al generated. Not because it's wrong but because

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Something I keep noticing is that LLMs can give really strong, coherent answers in a single prompt, but as soon as the conversation goes on for a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I swear I feel like I’m going crazy because I can tell almost immediately now when someone is using ChatGPT for their content and apparently

&#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/wilsoniumite"> /u/wilsoniumite </a> <br /> <span><a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>For my work (healthcare related) I often use patient narratives or narrative prompts that clinicians or clinical students will use for training.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>One thing I keep noticing with AI discussions is people treating LLMs like they’re objective truth machines when they’re really just pattern