404 Media: Research Gold Sold '100% Human-Written' Medical Peer Review That Was

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49267057">Comments</a>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I ran 90 research queries through 8 AI models simultaneously. 86% of findings were unique to one provider... not rephrasing, literally different

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Question: Has anyone else started using poor grammar and typos just to prove they aren’t AI? Or am I just a weirdo. </p> <p>I consider myself a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A couple of weeks ago I <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1sl5k6d/we_benchmarked_translategemma12b_against_5/">shared the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Google deployed an agentic AI peer-reviewer at two top CS conferences — reviewing ~10,000 papers with 30-minute turnaround — and the new formal

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I was browsing OpenReview and I came accross this person called Kevin Zhu <a

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1s3mwlh/a_nyt_modern_love_contributor_acknowledged_using/"> <img alt="A NYT Modern Love contributor