<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Before the Industrial Revolution, physical strength and the ability to perform physical work were major sources of value. After the Industrial
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Posting because this sub is where the policy conversation should be happening and it isn't. </p> <p>I'm the COO of a mid-Atlantic insurance
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'll be upfront about my endgame: I work at a large tech company, I have a niche picked out, and I'm making the move to build and sell AI agents
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>With things becoming increasingly automated, what's to stop robots and AI from outperforming humans on practically all physical and mental
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So I've been seeing this idea float around that as AI gets more dominant, there might be, a pushback where companies or people lean back into
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>want to put a different multi-agent direction on the table because most of what i see assumes task teams.</p> <p>the dominant pattern right now:
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The idea is simple, if one agent is good then multiple agents working together must be better. In practice coordination between agents is an
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Yesterday, Thinking Machines Lab (Mira Murati's company) announced something categorically new : <strong>Interaction models</strong> are AI
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →