Better tools made Copilot code review worse. Here’s how we actually improved it.

<p><strong>TL;DR:</strong> <em>GitHub gave Copilot code review better shared tools, but reused generic instructions — reviews got pricier and less accurate until they rewrote the

<p>Why shorter outputs can cost more, and how GitHub Copilot reduces wasted work across the complete coding task.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>I used coding agents to build agents that automated part of my job. Here's what I learned about working better with coding agents.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>GitHub for Beginners: Getting started with the GitHub Copilot CLI, a step-by-step tutorial.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>Better orchestration, fewer handoffs, faster progress, without a single new knob.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>Learn how to move an agent session from the GitHub Copilot app into VS Code without losing the conversation, code changes, or working context.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>How we rebuilt the diff surface in the GitHub Copilot app to open a million-line pull request with hundreds of inline review comments.</p> <p>The post <a

<p>A rewrite this size wasn't affordable before agents. Here's what porting the Copilot agent runtime to 800,000 lines of production Rust actually took.</p> <p>The post <a