Cursor Composer 2: The Cache Economy Behind a 10x Cheaper Coding Agent

<p>The price page hasn't moved. Five dollars per million input. Twenty-five per million output. Identical to Opus 4.6.</p> <p>Run the same Claude Code call on both, though, and

<h2> Cursor and Windsurf are not AI coding tools. They're slot machines wrapped in a dark theme. Both exploits Claude Opus 4.7's broken tokenizer—which silently inflates your

<p>Anthropic shipped Opus 4.7 on April 16, 2026. Same $5/$25 pricing as 4.6. Same 1M context. Same 128K output ceiling. Different model entirely when you put it in an agentic

<p>If you have already tried one of them, you are probably wondering whether the other is worth a switch. The short version is that <strong>Claude Code and Cursor are not

<p>Your Intel laptop has an NPU. It has probably had one for a while. Intel has been marketing it enthusiastically. You have been ignoring it politely.</p> <p>Fair enough. Until

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1wxfdt9/qwen38_27b_1_x_r9700_262k_context_half_a_million/"> <img alt="Qwen3.8 27B | 1 x R9700: 262K context,

<p>Cursor’s Composer 2 is the company’s newest agentic coding model, announced on March 19, 2026. Cursor describes it as “frontier-level at coding,” built for low-latency software

<h1> We Tested 10 Untested LLMs on Agent Coding — The Results Are In </h1> <p>Yesterday I promised to benchmark 10 LLMs that have never been tested on real agent coding tasks. I