AI video needs to be legally required to have some kind of metadata saying it is

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I watch a lot of these science mini documentaries on yt. And up until recently I actually just assumed someone made a lot of effort in the video

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>When it comes to legal things, AI views itself as a human being, subject to the same laws and rules.</p> <p>I've noticed this most when dealing

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So I work in the AI video space (I'm not promoting anything, I swear) and I'm deeply concerned about AI video. </p> <p>I played with Seedance and

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>just randomly stumbled on this while testing some prompts today and… kinda surprised tbh was playing around with a prompt-to-video tool (think

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Which AI software is the best a converting Images of ppl Into videos without changing their face too much? </p> <p>Currently I use VIDU, but I

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I keep seeing “audio-to-video converter” used for totally different things, so I’ve been trying to separate the workflows a bit.</p> <p>To me,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I saw that Dreamina just launched Seedance 2.0 recently and I spent a few days testing it. Since I handle a lot of video content for my team, I

<p>Anthropic just dropped <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing" rel="noopener noreferrer">Project Glasswing</a> — a big collaborative cybersecurity initiative with a shiny