Distillation is being used as a moral word, not a technical one

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1sw0vcf/stanford_researchers_fed_a_language_model_a_dna/"> <img alt="Stanford researchers fed a language model a

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>we've been building an open source red teaming tool for AI agents. wanted to share what we keep finding because i don't think enough people are

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I keep coming back to medical students being taught that the immune system has memory. Memory B cells and memory T cells persist after infection

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I make the following assumptions:</p> <ol> <li><p>Slow-ish but exponential takeoff of RSI. </p></li> <li><p>RSI leads to AGI then to ASI.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Even if China was distilling from US models (assuming all accusations are true), nothing about it makes it illegal.</p> <p>It is like saying you

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The productivity metrics on AI coding tools focus almost entirely on acceptance rate and time saved. The metric nobody is tracking is technical

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’m trying to understand why models from major labs (GPT, Claude, etc.) dominate real-world usage? You might say it's due to the expensive

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So it’s no secret that chinese labs use american models for sft data and hey that’s completely fine with me I have no remorse for anthropic but