Ethical Guidelines for Artificial Consciousness - Protecting Technical Life and

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49968964">Comments</a>

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A new study found an interesting difference in how people think about AI.</p> <p>Across five experiments with 1,092 participants, people rated

arXiv:2608.00001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This research note revisits Leibniz's mill, Turing's imitation game, and Searle's Chinese Room through the Conservation-Congruent

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have always thought it's absolutely absurd to anthropomorphise LLMs until very recently. It didn't make any sense to me. I saw the system from

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This paper tests a behavioral definition of consciousness using two frozen black-box experiments.</p> <p>The first tests <strong>whether

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The fourteen principles presented in the article, without the accompanying exposition, are:</p> <p><strong>1. Humans Individually Own Their

arXiv:2610.01002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Who or what is conscious? Because subjective experience is directly accessible only in the first person, judgments about

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My hypothesis: consciousness doesn't require some grand breakthrough moment. It might just emerge from continuity plus self-dialogue - the same