Qwen 3.6: worse adherence?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><blockquote> <p>Wait, I need to be careful about the &quot;no_think&quot; tag in the system prompt. The system prompt says <code>/no_think</code>.

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1tbzr64/qwen36_just_stops/"> <img alt="qwen3.6 just stops"

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey all, </p> <p>im having a crisis that i just cant figure... </p> <p>i used Qwen3.6-27B-GGUF:UD-Q8_K_XL ever since it came out (on a DGX SPARK)

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I build context/harness optimization tooling, so provider-side serialization quirks actually matter to me. If you're optimizing over prompts, you

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>With practically all of LocalLlama glazing Qwen 3.5/3.6 for it's coding skills. Along with the fact that Alibaba themselves are focusing on

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm using this <a href="https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled-v2-GGUF">opus 4.6 distilled version of

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I normally seldom experience loops, either reasoning or responses, using Qwen 3.6 27B Q8 with 256k context window in Agent Zero.</p> <p>But the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm genuinely unsure if I'm doing something wrong, or if the model is just worse, despite the community enthusiasm. I tend to use it with pi