<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Today officially marks the end of the author-reviewer discussion period. The acknowledgement deadline has already passed by over 3 days and our
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This is my first time submitting to ECCV, and I am obviously struggling with the 1 page limit of the rebuttal. I currently refer to 3 previous
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>UAI review results were released last Thursday, and the discussion period was clearly stated as April 23 to May 2nd.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone,</p> <p>I have a question about NeurIPS submission/review rules and anonymous code repositories.</p> <p>Suppose a paper was submitted
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My UAI paper got </p> <p>Pre rebuttal:</p> <p>Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4, 4/3, 3/3</p> <p>After rebuttal:</p> <p>Scores/Confidence: 6/4, 6/4,
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →