Does intelligence need a body, or can it learn to use one later?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>AI skills and agents feel like the units you can build real things with. Skills are portable, composable, they travel with the model. One skill

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Yesterday, Thinking Machines Lab (Mira Murati's company) announced something categorically new : <strong>Interaction models</strong> are AI

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>(AI Was not used for generating the below post)</p> <p>I've been developing with AI for over 3 1/2 years now, my AI DM setting operation which

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>You've heard this before, and now you're hearing it again. You roll your eyes. The problem with this statement is that AGI has no accepted

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><strong>quick context:</strong> we're a small AI creative agency, 9 people, based in Pune. we work with brands on commercial visuals product

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><ul> <li>Agents that change behavior under evaluation</li> <li>Agents that bypass system-level instructions to achieve objectives</li> <li>Agents

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It may not be the right sub, but I'm casting a broad net. </p> <p>How are you actually getting transparency out of your AI vendors?</p> <p>In

<p><strong>271 zero-day vulnerabilities. One AI model. One Firefox release.</strong> And that's just one of four stories worth your attention this fortnight.</p> <p>If you run