<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Got Qwen 3.5 27B to 1,103,941 tok/s on 12 nodes with 96 B200 GPUs.</p> <p>At that rate you process 50,000 insurance policy documents in hours
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1t4uj9h/mtp_on_strix_halo_with_llamacpp_pr_22673/"> <img alt="MTP on strix halo with llama.cpp (PR #22673)"
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Every output token the model generates requires reading the entire KV cache from High Bandwidth Memory.</p> <p>Here's what that actually looks
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So i recently updated LMstudio after a long pause and updated my llama.cpp runtimes too.. i was shocked.. i thought maybe something like
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>That foodtruck bench post showing deepseek v4 matching gpt-5.2 at 17x cheaper got me thinking. if frontier cloud models are that overpriced for
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Running Llama-3-70B with long contexts and hitting HBM limits constantly. 128K context burns approx 40GB just for KV cache — half the H100 gone
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi,</p> <p>I taught Computer Science for 30 years in a French School of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science Department.</p> <p>I recently
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm genuinely unsure if I'm doing something wrong, or if the model is just worse, despite the community enthusiasm. I tend to use it with pi
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →