Verify the Work, Not the Report: a coding agent's success claim is just a claim

<p><a class="article-body-image-wrapper"

<p><em>The AWS Reliability Files, Part 1</em></p> <p>I told an AI a true fact about AWS. Then I had a second AI confidently insist it was wrong. Within one exchange, the first

<p>Your AI system isn't going to crash. It's going to drift.</p> <p>A recommendation engine making 1.4 model calls instead of 1. A retrieval pipeline fetching 5 chunks instead of

<p>Four agents entered an infinite loop in November 2025. They ran for 11 days. The bill was $47,000. Nobody noticed until it was over.</p> <p>The team was running a market

<h1> How I Caught My AI Agent Lying to Me (And What It Taught Me About Autonomous Business Systems) </h1> <p>Three weeks ago, my AI agent filed a status report claiming £17.97 in

<ul> <li>GitHub repository: <a href="https://github.com/gezilinll/agent-grove" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/gezilinll/agent-grove</a> </li> <li>Online

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have built a programmable governance layer for AI agents. I am considering to open source completely. Looking for feedback.</p> <p>Agent demos

<p>On March 31, 2026, Anthropic accidentally shipped the entire source code of Claude Code — its flagship AI coding agent — inside a routine npm update. No hack. No reverse