How does codex €20 plan compare to claude/antigravity plans usage wise?

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My developer friends (who were obsessed with Claude Code a month ago) are now all jumping ship to Codex, which has left me wondering:</p> <p>Is

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>The recent changes to Codex limits have significantly degraded the developer experience.</p> <p>Previously, Codex in VS Code felt fluid and

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>For myslef im using it a lot but it will produce so much garbage its a full time job it feels like just maintaining scope. I combined all the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey, I’m considering getting Claude Pro ($20/month) mainly to use Claude Code for my dev projects (mostly solo/student-level work :scripts,

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If you have to choose between these two, what would u choose? I've been using Ollama free cloud models; it is great for small tasks, but some

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>OpenAI's Plus at $20 is genuinely usable. Not perfect, but you get real work done. That's fine.</p> <p>Anthropic is a different story. Claude's

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>At 1 point anthropic had their usage fucked up so hard, that you'd get more usage out of 2x 100$ plan and the 200$ plan mostly gave you the

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>New Codex limits are a joke. They said they would cut the 2x usage bonus and cut more of the 5hours limits, but the consumption has raised to