Next.js + NestJS: Useful Architecture or Unnecessary Complexity?

<blockquote> <p><strong>NestJS was deliberately designed so you can start simple and grow without rewriting.</strong> Here's how to take full advantage of that.</p> </blockquote>

<p>If you build microservices with NestJS, you already know how powerful and structured the framework is. However, starting a new project often involves a fair amount of initial

<p>In March 2024, Google replaced First Input Delay with Interaction to Next Paint as an official Core Web Vital. FID is gone. INP is what matters now — and most React apps that

<p>Next.js in 2026 is the most powerful it has ever been, and the most exhausting to keep up with. I've shipped production sites on every major version from 12 through 15, and

<p>We caught an architecture mistake in our own spec before it shipped.</p> <p>The early draft of the Cadencz backend spec assumed Next.js could carry both the frontend and a

<p><a class="article-body-image-wrapper"

<p>Architecture patterns are not academic exercises. They are practical solutions to problems that every web application encounters at some point: how to organize code so multiple

<p>Most docker-compose tutorials for Next.js stop at "here's a service block, here's how to mount your code." Then you start it on macOS, type a character in your editor, and hot