ChatGPT confidently gave me completely wrong information and I almost did not ca
Someone asked ChatGPT something that mattered — the kind of question where a wrong answer has real consequences — and received, in return, a fluent, unhesitating response that was completely incorrect. The near-miss is the whole point. Not the error itself, which is neither surprising nor new, but the moment of almost not checking. ChatGPT's confidence register is a specific and well-documented phenomenon: it does not stammer, does not qualify, does not pause in the way a human expert might when reaching the edge of what they actually know. It delivers wrong answers in exactly the same register as correct ones. That is the design, in a sense — the model has no internal signal for uncertainty that maps reliably onto its output tone. This user caught it. The implication is that plenty of others, in identical situations, do not.
If confirmed, here is what this means. The problem is not hallucination in the abstract — that word has become so familiar it has lost its teeth. The problem is calibration, or the complete absence of it in the user experience. People learn to trust sources that sound authoritative, and they learn to distrust sources that hedge or stumble. ChatGPT sounds authoritative by default, regardless of whether it should. Every professional field where people are now using these tools — law, medicine, finance, education, engineering — contains users who are acting on confidently delivered misinformation they never thought to verify. The second-order effect is a slow erosion of due diligence: the more often ChatGPT is right, the more it trains users to stop checking, which is precisely when the errors that get through start doing damage.
Watch for whether this account draws corroborating stories from other users, or whether it attracts a response from OpenAI on how confidence calibration is being addressed in future model versions. Either development would sharpen the picture considerably.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Not talking about doomsday AI stuff.</p> <p>I mean the fact that ChatGPT can sometimes give an answer that sounds completely intelligent,
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This AI has completely gone to shit, I ask it about a fucking build in a video game or the things you have to do to platinum a game or what the
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>There was a time when you could talk to ChatGPT and it would always find patterns to explore in your arguments. I used to be constantly astounded
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1t6qbdo/why_is_chatgpt_so_confidently_wrong_lately_it/"> <img alt="Why is ChatGPT so confidently wrong lately?
  submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/hi5yourface"> /u/hi5yourface </a> <br /> <span><a
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>there have been so many complaints that ChatGPT agrees with everything you say.</p> <p>I experienced that myself, but now, lately, it will almost
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>asked ChatGPT to roast me based on our conversations, thinking it would say something harmless.!!!!</p> <p>This thing brought up my
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Instead of asking ChatGPT to do something, I tell it who to be first.</p> <p><strong>Instead of: "Write me a sales email"</strong></p>
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →