US gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers by removing requirements for

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662672">Comments</a>

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1u88vkm/doj_aims_to_block_suit_over_musk_data_center/"> <img alt="DOJ aims to block suit over Musk data

<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49478103">Comments</a>

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1sfkoij/no_data_centers_sign_found_after_shooting_at/"> <img alt="‘No data centers’ sign found after shooting at

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>A massive <strong>hyperscale data center project</strong> in rural <strong>Box Elder County, Utah</strong>, led by Shark Tank investor Kevin

The EPA has proposed a rule change that would let states decide how much input the public has on air pollution permits. It would be a huge boon for data centers increasingly

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Made this after getting curious how the water-use numbers thrown around in AI news articles actually stack up site-by-site. A few notes:</p>

Rule would allow states to decide how much—if any—public input there can be.