<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Today officially marks the end of the author-reviewer discussion period. The acknowledgement deadline has already passed by over 3 days and our
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>BMVC reviews will be out tomorrow. Making this parent thread for discussion. All the best everyone!</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I was trying to submit to ICML FM4LS workshop but noticed that <a
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I want to make a position track decision thread because it is a niche and small track I think discussions will be submerged in the main track
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →