ICML 2026 am I cooked? [D]

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been seeing mainly discussions about the main track. Any ACs or other reviewers here who know if the position paper track is following

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As the title says, we haven't seen any like ACL provided. Very salty about the decision, as AC recommended findings and the reviewers tanked our

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey everyone!</p> <p>The decision notification deadline for the GlobalSouthML workshop was originally May 15th (and the site updated it to May

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>UAI review results were released last Thursday, and the discussion period was clearly stated as April 23 to May 2nd.

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>My paper cited and even built up on a niche topic that was accepted in 2024. The template and everything was also followed properly. Sure, it