<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Today officially marks the end of the author-reviewer discussion period. The acknowledgement deadline has already passed by over 3 days and our
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Any one got meta score 2.5 (borderline finding) and still accepted to findings previously?? In my case meta review didnot acknowledge the
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Had submitted a paper to ACL ARR May 2026 cycle. Unfortunately, none of the reviewers acknowledged the rebuttal during the author-reviewer
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone.</p> <p>UAI review results were released last Thursday, and the discussion period was clearly stated as April 23 to May 2nd.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I got my batch of four papers for AAAI 2027. All four papers make empirical claims, none include code, data, or anything I can actually check.
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →