<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We submitted our first paper to ARR, intending to commit to IJCNLP-AACL. Area: Multilingualism and Cross-Lingual NLP</p> <p>Scores: (3,4) (2.5,3)
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Mine was just submitted, and the submission count shown is still under 500.</p> <p>Does anyone know whether this count is meaningful for
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hey, can anyone see the AI review result in ARR May 2026 submission?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've been seeing mainly discussions about the main track. Any ACs or other reviewers here who know if the position paper track is following
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →