<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Starting a thread to discuss the ARR reviews for this cycle, as they will be released today. </p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by  
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We submitted our first paper to ARR, intending to commit to IJCNLP-AACL. Area: Multilingualism and Cross-Lingual NLP</p> <p>Scores: (3,4) (2.5,3)
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>ACL ARR May 2026 reviews are due on July 2. I do not see any reviewer assignement as of today. Will the review period be just 2 weeks in that
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I heard there is more pressure on the ACs to get final justifications and encourage reviewers to converge to a consensus. Is that true?</p> <hr
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1sj76a2/just_did_an_analysis_on_iclr_2025_vs_2026_scores/"> <img alt="Just did an analysis on ICLR 2025
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>ECCV reviews should be out by 2nd May. Since no exact time was specified this year, they’ll likely be released sometime within the next 48
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi, I am currently making the jump to ML from theoretical physics. I just got done with the review period, went from 4333 to 4433, but the
NewsHive monitors these sources continuously. All signal titles above link to the original reporting.
Intelligence by NewsHive. Need help navigating what this means for your business? Contact GeekyBee →